Modern family wealth is increasingly mobile, global and entrepreneurial, often sourced in a variety of ways and allocated across a range of traditional and nontraditional investments.

Families have lived through tumultuous social, economic and political times, and understand that the future is impossible to predict. Like them, their estate plans have to be adaptable.
While a well-crafted traditional trust, as described by Jeff Maurer here, often makes the most sense for most families, more complex trusts established in certain trust-friendly states can provide enhanced flexibility to those with special circumstances.
Let’s consider some of the key options available in these jurisdictions: bifurcation of trust functions; the ability to retain a beneficial interest in the trust; control over trust information; and flexible options for existing trusts.


A typical trust appoints a trustee with authority for investments and distributions. A directed trust allows for the allocation of those functions to a separate advisor or advisors. There are generally no statutory requirements for or limitations on how these roles are defined, meaning that they can be completely customized to meet specific needs.
For example, a special asset advisor can be appointed solely to oversee a closely held operating business, with the trustee continuing to provide traditional investment management services for the remaining assets. Similarly, a special distribution advisor can be appointed to control distributions for a beneficiary with special needs or substance abuse concerns, with the trustee retaining distribution authority for the remaining beneficiaries. It is also possible to appoint an advisory committee rather than a single advisor, thereby providing opportunities for family members, across multiple generations, to be involved in trust decision making (subject to any limitations on related powerholders under the tax laws).
Directed trust statutes also permit the appointment of a trust protector, who may be given broad powers to oversee the administration of the trust and to intervene when necessary. Common powers given to the trust protector include the power to amend the trust (including dispositive provisions), the power to add or remove beneficiaries, the power to change situs, the power to remove the trustee (and other advisors) and appoint successors, the power to divide, merge, combine or decant the trust, and even the power to terminate the trust early and distribute the assets outright. With perpetual or dynasty trusts that are designed to last for multiple generations, it is important to maintain the ability to modify or adapt the trust to take into account changes in circumstances that may affect the suitability of the original plan put in place for beneficiaries. Vesting those powers in a carefully selected independent trust protector provides continuity of oversight in the event of incapacity or death and can ensure that the trust can be monitored to avoid adverse tax consequences.


Several states now have laws expressly permitting the creation of a self-settled trust, often referred to as an asset protection trust. What sets these apart from traditional trusts is that they permit an individual to name themselves as a beneficiary of their own irrevocable trust, while still having the trust assets protected from their creditors (and excluded from their estate, if properly structured as a completed gift). While, as the name suggests, these trusts are typically used for asset protection purposes, the ability for the grantor to retain a beneficial interest, while still having the trust be treated as a completed gift, adds an invaluable level of flexibility to any trust structure.
Another example, is a traditional dynasty trust, funded with an individual’s entire lifetime exemption, which would ordinarily place those assets outside the reach of that individual should a financial need arise in the future, a consideration that many families find discouraging. One popular option is to include the spouse as a discretionary beneficiary, giving the grantor an indirect means to access the assets in the future. This does come with its own set of potential pitfalls, particularly if both spouses wish to establish trusts. This also isn’t an option for unmarried individuals. However, in an asset protection trust jurisdiction such as Delaware, the grantor can simply name themselves as a beneficiary of the trust, without changing its status as a completed gift dynasty trust.
Some advisors may consider the creation of a self-settled trust to be an overly aggressive strategy, given the relatively unproven nature of the structure from an estate and gift tax perspective, particularly for clients living in jurisdictions that do not allow asset protection trusts. It may be highly unlikely that the grantor would ever need to access the trust assets. In that case, a more conservative option would be a hybrid approach, whereby a trust is created in an asset protection trust jurisdiction and is structured in a way that it would qualify as a valid asset protection trust, but the grantor is not included as a beneficiary from the outset. Instead, a trust protector is given the power to add beneficiaries from a class that includes the grantor. In this way, at the time of creation and unless or until the grantor is added as a beneficiary, the trust would be treated as nothing more than a traditional completed gift dynasty trust. The grantor still retains the option to be added as a beneficiary should there be an extraordinary change in circumstances that necessitates access to the trust assets.


When creating a trust, it may be difficult to know how much information should be shared with trust beneficiaries and at what stage of their lives. Under most states’ laws, a trustee, by default, is required to inform adult beneficiaries of the existence of the trust and their status as a beneficiary. The beneficiary may then be entitled to further information, including accountings and copies of trust documents, upon reasonable request. This may be problematic, for example, if a beneficiary has a spending problem or is likely to use the availability of trust assets as an excuse to not provide for themselves.
However, Delaware and similar jurisdictions allow a trust instrument to limit or eliminate a beneficiary’s right to be informed of the trust for a period of time, which may be based on several factors, including the lifetime of the grantor or the age of a beneficiary. During that period, a trustee can be permitted to share limited information with specific beneficiaries, or the trust can be completely “silent” until the period has lapsed. It should be noted that a completely silent trust can create administrative complications, particularly if the intent is to make distributions during the silent period. In that instance, a trust protector may be given the authority to modify the notification restrictions if they are no longer in the best interests of the beneficiaries. In addition, depending on the specific jurisdiction, a designated representative may be appointed to represent the beneficiaries and act on their behalf in any judicial or nonjudicial proceeding (including court proceedings and nonjudicial settlement agreements) during the silent period.


Depending on the terms of the trust and the laws of the trust’s home jurisdiction, moving a trust to take advantage of the above strategies may be as simple as appointing a trustee authorized to administer the trust in the new jurisdiction, with no court proceedings required. Often, the governing law of the trust will change immediately upon the change in the place of administration. The trust can then fully avail itself of the various modification options under the new jurisdiction law, which may include decantings, mergers, nonjudicial settlement agreements, and modifications by consent.
These options are not for everyone. Establishing a trust in or moving an existing trust to a jurisdiction other than the grantor’s home jurisdiction invariably involves an additional level of time and expense, and often requires the retention of separate local counsel. In addition, deviations from the traditional trust structure, whether through a directed trust, a self-settled trust or a silent trust, provide an additional level of administrative complexity that should be balanced against the potential gains, in consultation with advisors. However, for the increasing number of families with complicated estate planning needs, a more trust-friendly jurisdiction may be able to provide significant advantages, and can serve as a valuable complement to traditional trusts as part of a comprehensive estate plan.
Alex Lyden-Horn is a Managing Director and the Director of Delaware Trust Services and Trust Counsel at Evercore Trust Company, N.A. He can be contacted at

Evercore Wealth Management, LLC ("EWM") is an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. EWM prepared this material for informational purposes only and should not be viewed as advice or recommendations with respect to asset allocation or any particular investment. It is not our intention to state or imply in any manner that past results are an indication of future performance. Future results cannot be guaranteed and a loss of principal may occur. This material does not constitute financial, investment, accounting, tax or legal advice. It does not constitute an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any security/instrument, or to participate in any trading strategy. The securities/instruments discussed in this material may not be suitable for all investors. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives. Specific needs of a client must be reviewed and assessed before determining the proper investment objective and asset allocation which may be adjusted to market circumstances. EWM may make investment decisions for its clients that are different from or inconsistent with the analysis in this report. EWM clients may invest in categories of securities or other instruments not covered in this report. Descriptions provided in this material are not substitutes for disclosure in offering documents for particular investment products. Any specific holdings discussed do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold or recommended by EWM, and the reader should not assume that investments in the companies identified and discussed were or will be profitable. Upon request, we will furnish a list of all securities recommended to clients during the past year. Performance results for individual accounts may vary due to the timing of investments, additions/withdrawals, length of relationship, and size of positions, among other reasons. Prospective investors should perform their own investigation and evaluation of investment options, should ask EWM for additional information if needed, and should consult their own attorney and other advisors. Indices are unmanaged and do not reflect fees or transaction expenses. You cannot invest directly in an index. References to benchmarks or indices are provided for information only. The securities discussed herein were holdings during the quarter. They will not always be the highest performing securities in the portfolio, but rather will have some characteristic of significance relevant to the article (e.g., reported news or event, a new contract, acquisition/divestiture, financing/refinancing, revenue or earnings, changes to management, change in relative valuation, plant strike, product recall, court ruling). EWM obtained this information from multiple sources believed to be reliable as of the date of publication; EWM, however, makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of such third party information. Unless otherwise noted, any recommendations, opinions and analysis herein reflect our judgment at the date of this report and are subject to change. EWM has no obligation to update, modify or amend this information or to otherwise notify a reader thereof in the event that any such information becomes outdated, inaccurate, or incomplete. EWM’s Privacy Policy is available upon request. EWM is compensated for the investment advisory services it provides, generally based on a percentage of assets under management. In addition to the investment management fees charged, clients may be responsible for additional expenses, such as brokerage fees, custody fees, and fees and expenses charged by third-party mutual funds, pooled investment vehicles, and third-party managers that may be recommended to clients. A complete description of EWM’s advisory fees is available in Part 2A of EWM’s Form ADV. Trust services are provided by Evercore Trust Company, N.A., a national trust bank regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and/or Evercore Trust Company of Delaware, a limited purpose trust company regulated by the Delaware State Bank Commissioner, both affiliates of EWM. Custody services are provided by Evercore Trust Company, N.A. The use of any word or phrase contained herein that could be considered superlative is not intended to imply that EWM is the only firm capable of providing adequate advisory services. This material does not purport to be a complete description of our investment services. This document is prepared for the use of EWM clients and prospective clients and may not be redistributed, retransmitted or disclosed, in whole or in part, or in any form or manner, without the express written consent of EWM. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. The Chartered Financial Analyst and CFA trademarks are the property of CFA Institute. Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards Inc. owns the certification marks CFP®, Certified Financial Planner™ and CFP® in the U.S.

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:

Pursuant to IRS Regulations, we inform you that any U.S. Federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for (i) the purpose of avoiding IRS imposed penalties or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. This information is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, tax or legal advice.

©2016 Evercore Wealth Management LLC. All rights reserved.