Each sibling, they say, experiences a different family.

That’s true for their parents too, as they watch each of their children grow as individuals, so different from their brothers and sisters, no matter how close in age or how much the parents strive to treat them equally. And just when parents think they have figured out each child, they can change again, as subtle differences in temperament and experiences compound. The valedictorian wants to take a gap year or more to travel with his band; the athlete is injured; a hitherto easygoing child starts to struggle – anything can happen. So how can parents (and grandparents) of more than one child plan accordingly?
This subject – fair versus equal in wealth management – has many important aspects, all worth considering in depth. (See below for links to some of our related recent publications and webinars.) But let’s concentrate here on one potential solution, for parents and grandparents considering their estate planning. A family sprinkling trust, also known as a pot trust, provides a way for grantors to benefit a class of individuals – typically children, grandchildren, and further descendants – assigning funds to a class of people instead of to specific individuals. It’s a pooled family asset, available to each member according to their needs at the discretion afforded to
the trustee(s) by the grantor.

Typically, parents and grandchildren set up a sprinkling trust to make gifts to very young children, who will likely not need to access the trust assets or income for some time. (The trust can also provide for the surviving parent in the class.) While the trust could remain a single pot forever, it will more likely remain collective until the ages by which the children will have likely completed their educations and begun their careers and families of their own. At that time, the trust could be split, or divided into separate trusts – for each child, their descendants, and their spouses – as the grantors see fit. Or the sprinkling trust could remain intact, to accommodate careers with very different earning potential, for example. The investment banker and charity worker are likely to face different challenges – although, again, anything can happen.
In the interim, the trust structure allows a young family to adjust for different and changing circumstances. A child with special needs will almost certainly require relatively more support. But other differences could be appropriate reasons to disperse funds; for example, one child may really benefit from private school while the other is thriving at public school, at least for now.
Sprinkling trusts can be very helpful for blended families, in which children may be spaced farther apart in age. The structure allows for the younger beneficiaries to access funds for education and other needs that may have already been met for the older children. The distribution won’t be equal, but it will be fair. A Connecticut-based couple discovered that recently, when they set up a sprinkling trust for their blended family, with five children spanning seven years in age, two with mild development disorders. The couple decided that a sprinkling trust benefiting the survivor and all the children until the youngest reached 30 years old made the most sense. At the death of the survivor, the balance of the trust (provided the children are all 30) will continue in separate trusts for each of their children and, secondarily, for their children, with the same provisions.
This couple’s trust, like most well drafted trusts, allows for an independent trustee to make discretionary allocations as needed, to protect each member and maintain family harmony. Many families opt to include a Limited Power of Appointment in their planning documents. This allows for the primary beneficiary, say a surviving spouse, to appoint the shares unequally or in different trusts that meet changed circumstances. The situs of the trust is also important. Delaware situs trusts can provide even more flexibility, allowing a specially appointed person (a “trust advisor/protector”) to make changes during the term of the trust that would accommodate needs that were unknown when first drafted.
Trusts also need to be properly managed. Investment and management decisions for a trust designed to serve children and potentially future generations generally shouldn’t be that dissimilar from a thoughtful, sophisticated, goals-based investment process. Risk/return trade-offs, cash flow requirements, and income tax status need to be evaluated much like an advisor would do for individuals. Investment vehicles that were once the preserve of institutional investors can now be used to complement the overall strategy of the trust and to grow wealth as well as to protect it.
Most important, the trust is flexible; it can change as the family’s circumstances evolve, as they surely will. The valedictorian’s band tour could become the start of something big – or an anecdote in a life well lived. And his siblings will have their own – and likely very different – setbacks and successes. The trust needs to be flexible enough to honor its stated purpose, but also the true intent of the grantor, to treat the children fairly. A fully discretionary trust that will last for generations, places a lot of responsibility on trustee(s) now and in the future. Future trustee(s) must be able to carry through the intentions of the grantor(s) in making disbursement decisions across an expanding class that could potentially threaten family harmony.
All told, sprinkling trusts are a good solution for many families. They provide protection for potential spendthrifts, from creditors (including divorcing spouses), and for family members with special needs. They also provide a vehicle that can be sheltered from future federal estate and generation-skipping taxes, subject to very careful consideration.
Finally, keep in mind that the current federal estate, gift, and generation-skipping tax lifetime exemption is now $12.92 million, or double that for a married couple, but is scheduled to revert in 2025 to about $6.2 million, indexed for inflation. Transfer strategies should only be executed in the context of long-term plans, but there is good reason now to accelerate those plans.
Kate Mulvany is a Partner and Wealth & Fiduciary Advisor at Evercore Wealth Management. She can be contacted at

Evercore Wealth Management, LLC ("EWM") is an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. EWM prepared this material for informational purposes only and should not be viewed as advice or recommendations with respect to asset allocation or any particular investment. It is not our intention to state or imply in any manner that past results are an indication of future performance. Future results cannot be guaranteed and a loss of principal may occur. This material does not constitute financial, investment, accounting, tax or legal advice. It does not constitute an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any security/instrument, or to participate in any trading strategy. The securities/instruments discussed in this material may not be suitable for all investors. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives. Specific needs of a client must be reviewed and assessed before determining the proper investment objective and asset allocation which may be adjusted to market circumstances. EWM may make investment decisions for its clients that are different from or inconsistent with the analysis in this report. EWM clients may invest in categories of securities or other instruments not covered in this report. Descriptions provided in this material are not substitutes for disclosure in offering documents for particular investment products. Any specific holdings discussed do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold or recommended by EWM, and the reader should not assume that investments in the companies identified and discussed were or will be profitable. Upon request, we will furnish a list of all securities recommended to clients during the past year. Performance results for individual accounts may vary due to the timing of investments, additions/withdrawals, length of relationship, and size of positions, among other reasons. Prospective investors should perform their own investigation and evaluation of investment options, should ask EWM for additional information if needed, and should consult their own attorney and other advisors. Indices are unmanaged and do not reflect fees or transaction expenses. You cannot invest directly in an index. References to benchmarks or indices are provided for information only. The securities discussed herein were holdings during the quarter. They will not always be the highest performing securities in the portfolio, but rather will have some characteristic of significance relevant to the article (e.g., reported news or event, a new contract, acquisition/divestiture, financing/refinancing, revenue or earnings, changes to management, change in relative valuation, plant strike, product recall, court ruling). EWM obtained this information from multiple sources believed to be reliable as of the date of publication; EWM, however, makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of such third party information. Unless otherwise noted, any recommendations, opinions and analysis herein reflect our judgment at the date of this report and are subject to change. EWM has no obligation to update, modify or amend this information or to otherwise notify a reader thereof in the event that any such information becomes outdated, inaccurate, or incomplete. EWM’s Privacy Policy is available upon request. EWM is compensated for the investment advisory services it provides, generally based on a percentage of assets under management. In addition to the investment management fees charged, clients may be responsible for additional expenses, such as brokerage fees, custody fees, and fees and expenses charged by third-party mutual funds, pooled investment vehicles, and third-party managers that may be recommended to clients. A complete description of EWM’s advisory fees is available in Part 2A of EWM’s Form ADV. Trust services are provided by Evercore Trust Company, N.A., a national trust bank regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and/or Evercore Trust Company of Delaware, a limited purpose trust company regulated by the Delaware State Bank Commissioner, both affiliates of EWM. Custody services are provided by Evercore Trust Company, N.A. The use of any word or phrase contained herein that could be considered superlative is not intended to imply that EWM is the only firm capable of providing adequate advisory services. This material does not purport to be a complete description of our investment services. This document is prepared for the use of EWM clients and prospective clients and may not be redistributed, retransmitted or disclosed, in whole or in part, or in any form or manner, without the express written consent of EWM. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. The Chartered Financial Analyst and CFA trademarks are the property of CFA Institute. Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards Inc. owns the certification marks CFP®, Certified Financial Planner™ and CFP® in the U.S.

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:

Pursuant to IRS Regulations, we inform you that any U.S. Federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for (i) the purpose of avoiding IRS imposed penalties or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. This information is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, tax or legal advice.

©2016 Evercore Wealth Management LLC. All rights reserved.