Well-researched, investment-grade municipal and corporate bonds remain an important part of a balanced portfolio, even if market expectations of “Trumpinflation” come to pass.

Bonds, unlike many other asset classes, are uncorrelated to equities and, in our view, should continue to generate positive returns, net of taxes, inflation and fees over the long term.
It’s important to note that a president can only directly control fiscal policy; the independent Federal Reserve controls monetary policy, which is the more powerful mechanism to regulate inflation through interest rates. While the President has opportunities to appoint the Fed board members, including the chairperson in January 2018, the Fed is likely to continue on its current course of slowly raising interest rates. Fiscal policy can be powerful, however, and can impact both inflation, and state and local government finances.


Funding for infrastructure and defense, as promised by President Trump, could come from some combination of increased national debt levels, cuts in other spending programs, public-private partnerships, or one-time gains on revenues from taxes on corporate foreign earnings. To the extent that additional spending is funded with new debt, it would increase the level of new money in the system, which theoretically would push prices up. This infusion of money would affect inflation only temporarily, however, unless the infrastructure spending was put to use on capital projects that had a longer-term impact on economic productivity. For example, a bridge that reduces the average commute in a metropolitan area would drive lasting productivity gains, while repaving a road that was already in good shape would not have a similar multiplier, or longer-term effect.


The president and Congress have proposed a number of different tax policies, most of which would reduce the rate of taxes for corporations and individuals, and would broaden the tax base by eliminating loopholes. Most economists agree that these measures would be positive for growth and also cause some inflationary pressures. But as always, the devil is in the details. Some of the specific tax policies proposed lack economic consensus regarding their impact on growth and inflation. For instance, the Border Adjustment Tax, which would place a 20% tax on all imports and a tax subsidy on all exports, is largely seen as inflationary, as consumers would likely incur much of that price increase. There is no consensus on whether this policy would spark meaningful economic growth. At the other end of the spectrum, the proposal to disallow corporations to deduct interest costs would disincentivize companies from taking on high debt loads, potentially reducing corporate leverage, which is deflationary.


Trade policy was an important plank in President Trump’s campaign, and he has continued strong protectionist rhetoric since the inauguration. While it remains unclear what, if any, protectionist trade policies will be implemented, we would stress that policies that result in reduction of global trade, such as tariffs and quotas, have a generally negative effect on global growth and increase inflation. This assumes domestic production is more expensive than the goods being imported, as is usually the case in the United States. Consumers are then left purchasing higher priced foreign goods (due to tariffs), or a reduced supply of foreign goods (due to quotas), forcing them to purchase higher cost domestic goods.


President Trump and his advisors have focused their deregulation rhetoric on the financial services, energy and healthcare industries, aiming to lower the cost of doing business and, in turn, spur growth. The likely effect on inflation is more mixed. For example, energy deregulation would likely result in increased energy supply, which would be deflationary, while financial services deregulation could result in an increase in lending by community banks, which would be inflationary.


Pro-growth policies can have a significant impact on inflation, as well as on economic and corporate growth. The more confidence people have in future growth, the more they may invest in the economy, creating the potential for a self-fulfilling virtuous cycle. As the chart on page 8 indicates, there are some early economic indicators that animal spirits have heightened since November; we have seen spikes in confidence levels among consumers, small businesses and CEOs.
While not every Trump policy will be inflationary, the aggregate is likely to have at least some inflationary impact. But there are other factors, both long and short term, that could mitigate these effects. The Federal Reserve has begun its interest rate hiking cycle, and its officials have said that they expect to increase rates another two to three times in 2017. Higher interest rates could cool inflation by increasing the cost of debt and slowing both consumer and corporate borrowing, potentially curtailing growth in key sectors of the economy, such as housing. The strong U.S. dollar, which has increased against most other currencies since the election, with many market participants anticipating further strength, is also potentially disinflationary or deflationary. (See the chart on page 8.) A strong dollar can decrease earnings of U.S.-based multinational companies, hurt U.S. exports and reduce commodity prices, and also hurt emerging market economies.
Longer term, aging demographics, technological advancements that reduce the need for human labor, and unsustainably high levels of national debt relative to GDP are all deflationary forces that could mitigate the effect of Trumpinflation and stem increases in interest rates.
For bondholders, the primary concerns are twofold: Policies could have an adverse impact on credit by negatively affecting state and local finances or an adverse impact on interest rates via rising inflation or growth. Municipal bond and U.S. government bond interest rates have already made a significant move higher, with the 10-year Treasury rising to 2.25% (and as high as 2.63% in mid-March) from 1.85% prior to the election. If inflation expectations continue to rise and the Fed continues to hike interest rates in 2017, rates may rise and bond prices will fall.
Even if we make the somewhat draconian assumption that interest rates continue to rise from today’s level to 5% for a 10-year Treasury five years from now, a hypothetical portfolio of 4.5-year duration bonds would still manage to eke out a small positive gain of around 1% net of taxes each year – below inflation expectations, but still positive.
Chart One_GIM_Weighing Policy_HC.BP_Page 8
Chart Two_GIM_Weighing Policy_HC.BP_Page 8
So why hold bonds at all if expectations are for higher interest rates? In this example, each year that interest rates go higher, the hypothetical portfolio would throw off more income, as it can reinvest maturing securities in higher yielding bonds, providing more cushion as interest rates increase further. There is a chance that none of the policy prescriptions President Trump has proposed are implemented as expected, that they don’t work as planned, or that President Trump focuses more on policies that are negative for growth, like trade protectionism, than the markets currently expect. There is also the risk that exogenous events, such as a further economic slowdown in China, eclipse the effects of good fiscal domestic policy. Finally, longer-term deflationary or disinflationary trends, including aging demographics, technological advancements, and unsustainable national debt levels, could happen faster than most investors expect, keeping the 35-year bull market in bonds charging for the foreseeable future.
In this era of radical uncertainty, the best portfolio defense is true diversification. A portfolio of well-researched, investment-grade municipal and corporate bonds continues to make sense as an important part of a balanced portfolio.
Editor’s note: This article is excerpted from a paper published by Evercore Wealth Management in February and an update in March following the defeat of the Republican efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. To read the articles in full, please visit
Brian Pollak is a Partner and Portfolio Manager at Evercore Wealth Management. He can be contacted at Howard Cure is the Director of Municipal Bond Research at Evercore Wealth Management. He can be contacted at

Evercore Wealth Management, LLC ("EWM") is an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. EWM prepared this material for informational purposes only and should not be viewed as advice or recommendations with respect to asset allocation or any particular investment. It is not our intention to state or imply in any manner that past results are an indication of future performance. Future results cannot be guaranteed and a loss of principal may occur. This material does not constitute financial, investment, accounting, tax or legal advice. It does not constitute an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any security/instrument, or to participate in any trading strategy. The securities/instruments discussed in this material may not be suitable for all investors. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives. Specific needs of a client must be reviewed and assessed before determining the proper investment objective and asset allocation which may be adjusted to market circumstances. EWM may make investment decisions for its clients that are different from or inconsistent with the analysis in this report. EWM clients may invest in categories of securities or other instruments not covered in this report. Descriptions provided in this material are not substitutes for disclosure in offering documents for particular investment products. Any specific holdings discussed do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold or recommended by EWM, and the reader should not assume that investments in the companies identified and discussed were or will be profitable. Upon request, we will furnish a list of all securities recommended to clients during the past year. Performance results for individual accounts may vary due to the timing of investments, additions/withdrawals, length of relationship, and size of positions, among other reasons. Prospective investors should perform their own investigation and evaluation of investment options, should ask EWM for additional information if needed, and should consult their own attorney and other advisors. Indices are unmanaged and do not reflect fees or transaction expenses. You cannot invest directly in an index. References to benchmarks or indices are provided for information only. The securities discussed herein were holdings during the quarter. They will not always be the highest performing securities in the portfolio, but rather will have some characteristic of significance relevant to the article (e.g., reported news or event, a new contract, acquisition/divestiture, financing/refinancing, revenue or earnings, changes to management, change in relative valuation, plant strike, product recall, court ruling). EWM obtained this information from multiple sources believed to be reliable as of the date of publication; EWM, however, makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of such third party information. Unless otherwise noted, any recommendations, opinions and analysis herein reflect our judgment at the date of this report and are subject to change. EWM has no obligation to update, modify or amend this information or to otherwise notify a reader thereof in the event that any such information becomes outdated, inaccurate, or incomplete. EWM’s Privacy Policy is available upon request. EWM is compensated for the investment advisory services it provides, generally based on a percentage of assets under management. In addition to the investment management fees charged, clients may be responsible for additional expenses, such as brokerage fees, custody fees, and fees and expenses charged by third-party mutual funds, pooled investment vehicles, and third-party managers that may be recommended to clients. A complete description of EWM’s advisory fees is available in Part 2A of EWM’s Form ADV. Trust services are provided by Evercore Trust Company, N.A., a national trust bank regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and/or Evercore Trust Company of Delaware, a limited purpose trust company regulated by the Delaware State Bank Commissioner, both affiliates of EWM. Custody services are provided by Evercore Trust Company, N.A. The use of any word or phrase contained herein that could be considered superlative is not intended to imply that EWM is the only firm capable of providing adequate advisory services. This material does not purport to be a complete description of our investment services. This document is prepared for the use of EWM clients and prospective clients and may not be redistributed, retransmitted or disclosed, in whole or in part, or in any form or manner, without the express written consent of EWM. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. The Chartered Financial Analyst and CFA trademarks are the property of CFA Institute. Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards Inc. owns the certification marks CFP®, Certified Financial Planner™ and CFP® in the U.S.

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:

Pursuant to IRS Regulations, we inform you that any U.S. Federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for (i) the purpose of avoiding IRS imposed penalties or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. This information is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, tax or legal advice.

©2016 Evercore Wealth Management LLC. All rights reserved.